Box 2
Contains 33 Results:
EPA News Release: EPA Seeks Public Comments on the Proposed Consent Decree for Butterworth Landfill (March 1987), 1987
The other documents are still of importance to the Butterworth Landfill site, but do not have any discernible connection to the rest of the collection.
EPA Region 5 NPL Fact Sheet, Butterworth #2 Landfill, Michigan
These documents are also produced by the EPA, but in a different fashion than those formal administrative records they had produced. The booklets, files, and directories were produced in order to be distributed to the public. This was done in an attempt to educate them on what the general EPA policies are as well as what they had planned on doing to the Butterworth Landfill site.
U.S. EPA Administrative Record: Remedial Action Update no. 3, Chem Central Site, Grand Rapids, Michigan, October 1991, Volume 2 of 2, Memorandum, 1991
These files are those that the EPA had produced when their plans had been forced to change. This could have been because of financial constraints, unforeseen obstacles in construction, or changes in regulations.
U.S. EPA Administrative Record: Remedial Action Update no. 3, Chem Central Site, Grand Rapids, Michigan, October 1991, Volume 2 of 2, Public Comments, 1991
These files are those that the EPA had produced when their plans had been forced to change. This could have been because of financial constraints, unforeseen obstacles in construction, or changes in regulations.
U.S. EPA Administrative Record: Remedial Action Update no. 3, Chem Central Site, Grand Rapids, Michigan, October 1991, Volume 2 of 2, Reports/Studies, 1991
These files are those that the EPA had produced when their plans had been forced to change. This could have been because of financial constraints, unforeseen obstacles in construction, or changes in regulations.
U.S. EPA Administrative Record: Remedial Action Update no. 3, Chem Central Site, Grand Rapids, Michigan, October 1991, Volume 2 of 2, Transcript, 1991
These files are those that the EPA had produced when their plans had been forced to change. This could have been because of financial constraints, unforeseen obstacles in construction, or changes in regulations.
U.S. EPA Administrative Record: Remedial Action Update no. 4, Chem Central Site, Grand Rapids, Michigan, Volume 1 of 1, November 1991, 1991
These files are those that the EPA had produced when their plans had been forced to change. This could have been because of financial constraints, unforeseen obstacles in construction, or changes in regulations.
U.S. EPA Administrative Record: Remedial Action Update no. 4, Chem Central Site, Grand Rapids, Michigan, Volume 1 of 1, November 1991, Correspondence, 1991
These files are those that the EPA had produced when their plans had been forced to change. This could have been because of financial constraints, unforeseen obstacles in construction, or changes in regulations.
U.S. EPA Administrative Record: Remedial Action Update no. 4, Chem Central Site, Grand Rapids, Michigan, Volume 1 of 1, November 1991, Report/Studies, 1991
These files are those that the EPA had produced when their plans had been forced to change. This could have been because of financial constraints, unforeseen obstacles in construction, or changes in regulations.
U.S. EPA Administrative Record: Butterworth Landfill Site, Grand Rapids, Michigan, March 1991 Part 2 of 2 EMPTY, 1991
This series is composed of files generated by the EPA during their management and reclamation of the Butterworth Landfill Site. These administrative files are governmental files that detail their operations plans, as well as the changes and amendments that were made to them.